[DISCUSS] Foo Proposal
This cookbook, combined with our homepage, is meant to provide all the essential information that you need to incubate a project at the ASF.
It is meant to be the central point for all questions related to incubation, providing an overview of the incubation goals and process, and linking to more detailed information.
It is organized in chronological order of the steps that lead from incubating project acceptance to graduation as a top-level project.
The style that we expect here is short explanations with links to the details as needed, written in a friendly and helpful tone.
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) provides software for the public good, as explained in our vision statement from 2018.
Our projects operate according to The Apache Way, a set of principles and best practices that are described on the Foundation’s website.
We put a strong emphasis on Community Over Code, fierce independence from companies and organizations and openness in all aspects of our work.
Donating your project to the ASF means giving up control of it, and its trademarks if any. You’ll be very welcome to participate in the project but without a special status beyond being part of its Project Management Committee (PMC). The good news is that your project can then take a life of its own, with a potentially much broader reach, due to the ASF’s independence and emphasis on project sustainability.
Assuming your project fits this mindset, the acceptance of your project is not linked to what it does, as the ASF on purpose does not have a technical strategy. If it’s very similar to one of our existing projects, we will probably ask you to consider joining it. Still, some of our projects exist for similar purposes, and that’s not necessarily a problem.
To give our "podlings" (incubating projects) the best chances of success, we usually ask them to enter the Incubator with at least the start of a community built around an existing codebase.
The goal of incubation is to become an Apache Software Foundation (ASF) Top-Level project.
See the How the ASF works page for what this means and what the various roles (committers, PMC members etc.) mean.
To achieve this, an incoming project ("podling") goes through the following steps.
Find a champion and incubation mentors and discuss and prepare an incubation proposal
Decide to incubate at the ASF
Discuss the proposal with the Incubator PMC
If needed, refine the list of initial committers and mentors in the proposal
if needed, refine the proposal based on Incubator PMC feedback
Let the Incubator PMC vote on the proposal
Setup the podling’s infrastructure
Start building a community around the podling’s code
Invite new committers and PPMC members
Make podling releases and document and refine the release process
When ready to graduate, assess the podling’s readiness with the incubation mentors
If applicable prepare the transfer of existing trademarks to the ASF
Discuss graduation with the Incubator PMC
Start the graduation vote with the Incubator PMC, leading to an ASF Board resolution to establish the top-level project.
Described above is the "happy case", things might happen in a slightly different order, but it gives an overview of the typical incubation process.
These steps are described in more detail below.
The Incubator PMC manages the Incubator and helps incoming projects in their journey through incubation.
To communicate with the Incubator PMC use the public link:+https://firstname.lastname@example.org [email@example.com] mailing list. That page has links to subscribe to the list.
To enter the Incubator, your project needs a champion and at least two or three mentors.
These people need to be part of the Incubator PMC, which ASF Members can join just by asking.
The Champion helps the incoming podling in the process of creating their proposal and acts as a liaison between the podling and the Incubator PMC for the initial steps, at least until the podling’s proposal is accepted. They may stay on to act as a mentor after that.
The Mentors accompany the podling for all phases that lead to graduation as a top-level project.
The Champion helps the podling prepare an incubation proposal that describes the incoming project for the initial discussions with the Incubator PMC.
The proposal needs to include several standard sections, see the podling proposal template.
Prior proposals are kept on the Incubator wiki. They can be consulted as examples, keeping in mind that the proposal template mentioned above is the current reference for new proposals.
Once the proposal is ready, the podling representatives send it to the firstname.lastname@example.org list for discussions, with a subject line like
[DISCUSS] Foo Proposal
to raise the Incubator PMC’s attention.
The discussion often leads to small or large changes to the proposal.
There’s no set duration for this discussion phase, it lasts for a few days until the discussion dies down once all discussion points have been addressed.
For recent discussions threads see:
Once the discussion phase is finished, the Champion or a podling representative starts a [VOTE] thread on the email@example.com list.
The vote happens according to the ASF voting rules. In short, it’s held on the Incubator mailing list, lasts at least 72 hours and is a majority vote by the Incubator PMC members, with others being welcome to cast votes.
TODO link to recent votes as examples
Once the Incubator PMC votes to establish the podling, its infrastructure can be set up.
Usually, the Champion or incubation mentors drive this process. However, it can also be driven by podling community members if they know how to proceed.
TODO link to detailed instructions, do we have an up-to-date JIRA template for that?
Publicity is not permitted before the Incubator PMC accepts the podling.
There are also some restrictions about how podlings can advertise themselves and especially around press releases related to podlings.
During incubation, the podling is expected to build and expand its community, which includes voting in new committers and PPMC members.
Discussions of candidates and votes happen on the podling’s private PPMC mailing list, that’s one of the few uses of that list as generally, all discussions happen in the open.
Expanding and especially renewing project communities is an essential part of the ASF’s governance, as it fosters project durability.
A podling is expected to make several software releases during incubation, that gradually progress towards being fully conformant to the ASF Release Policy. Fully conformant releases are a condition for graduation.
Podling releases must also include the word "incubating" in any release file names and include a DISCLAIMER or DISCLAIMER-WIP as per the Incubator Releases Guide, to prevent any confusion as to the project’s status. As podlings are not yet "real" ASF projects, it is important to set expectations right.
Note that Apache Releases consist of source code only. However it is common for our projects to also distribute compiled packages along with their releases. The focus is on the actual source code releases and all distributed compiled packages are based on those "official" releases.
Voting on podling releases happens in two phases:
First, the podling votes on the release on their dev mailing list. The main goal of this vote is for the podling community to practice and learn voting on releases. The vote is successful if there are at least three +1 votes from PPMC members, and more +1 than -1 votes from PPMC members.
Then, if that first vote is successful, an Incubator PMC vote is held on the Incubator General mailing list. This is required to make the vote an Act of the Foundation, as for all ASF releases.
Votes from the podling dev list should be carried over to the Incubator PMC vote, by explicitly mentioning the podling vote result and including a lists.apache.org link to the podling vote tally, in the Incubator PMC [VOTE] message. This allows votes from mentors and other Incubator PMC members to be binding in the Incubator PMC vote, without people having to vote twice.
Both the podling and Incubator votes follow the standard ASF voting principles: they are majority votes that last at least 72 hours and if people vote several times only their last vote counts.
Podling are "TLPs in training", and most of what they do is the same as TLPs, especially as they progress in their incubation journey.
The main differences are:
As opposed to PMCs, podlings cannot make formal decisions on the ASF’s behalf as they are not formally part of the ASF’s structure. They are not mentioned in the the ASF’s bylaws for example. This means that the Incubator PMC needs to act as a proxy for the podlings to formalize things like ASF Releases and make them Acts of the Foundation.
As a consequence, a podling has a PPMC (Podling Project Management Committee) which operates like the PMC of a top-level project but needs to delegate a few things, like final votes on ASF Releases, to the Incubator PMC.
The decision to elect people as committers or PPMC members, or both, is similar to TLPs. A podling can decide that candidates are elected to the PPMC directly, or make them committers first and wait a bit to "promote" the as PPMC members. Committers, on the other hand, have no formal decision power, so a two-stage process is often preferred, but it’s not a requirement. Read How the ASF works for more information about this.
Each TLP has a PMC Chair who acts as a liaison between the TLP and the Board. PMC Chairs are not project leaders. It’s an administrative role even though they get a VP title due to the ASF’s organization. Podlings do not have this role, incubation mentors are volunteer community members act as the liaison between the podling and the Incubator PMC.
Podling releases require a two-phase vote as described elsewhere in this cookbook.
The ASF strongly encourages projects to grow and renew their roster regularly, to foster project sustainability. Both podlings and TLPs should be actively looking to elect new committers and PMC members by keeping an eye on who’s active in their communities.
Once the podling community starts feeling ready to graduate, they should make a self-assessment of that readiness.
The Maturity Model maintained by the ASF’s Community Development PMC is a good canvas for that and can help discover things that might have been overlooked during incubation. The Maturity Model page includes links to examples from graduate podlings.
Once the community and its incubation mentors feel that the podling is ready to graduate, based on their readiness self-assessment, a [DISCUSS] thread is started on the Incubator general mailing list, proposing graduation and asking the Incubator PMC to review the podling.
It’s best to include the graduation resolution in this discussion, to be ready for the vote that follows.
If the people or organizations who donated the podling code to the ASF own trademarks that the podling needs, they must be transferred to the ASF before graduation.
TODO link to details
Once the discussion dies down on the graduation proposal, a [VOTE] is started on the Incubator general mailing list, in which Incubator PMC Members cast their votes to accept recommending graduation to the ASF’s Board of Directors.
This vote follows the standard ASF voting principles, it’s a majority vote that lasts at least 72 hours and if people vote several times only their last vote counts.
Once the Incubator PMC votes to graduate the podling, it sends the Board Resolution that was created for the vote to the ASF’s Board of Directors.
The Board currently meets every third Wednesday of the month and votes on such resolutions.
The Board vote is effective immediately, although the public minutes of the Board meeting are published later, usually within a month.
Once graduated, the podling needs to reflect its new status on the Incubator status pages and make a few changes to its resources and processes.
The Life after Graduation guide lists the corresponding tasks.